Their news is so much better...

There is an old Jewish joke:

In the 1930s, a story is told of a Jewish man, Rosenberg, who was riding on the subway in NYC, reading an Nazi propaganda newspaper. Goldstein, a friend of his, who happened to be riding in the same subway car, noticed this strange phenomenon. Very upset, he approached the newspaper reader.

Goldstein says, "Rosenberg, have you lost your mind? Why are you reading a Nazi propaganda newspaper?"

Rosenberg replies, "I used to read everyday, the Jewish Daily Forward newspaper, but what did I find? Jews being persecuted, Jews being attacked, Jews being taken to concentration camps, Jews living in ghettos. So I switched to the Nazi propaganda newspaper. Now what do I find? Jews own all the banks, Jews control the media, Jews are all rich and powerful, Jews rule the world. Their news is so much better!"

That is exactly why I like listening to Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Mark Levin, Laura Ingraham. Sometimes Mike Savage or Bob Grant although they're completely nuts.

They say over and over again how the liberals [or 'Libs' as Levin likes to say] control the media, the current polls, the banking industry, the entertainment media, unions, the newspapers. Their news is so much better than say NPR or Air America news.

Of course, they have Rovian code names for all these like "Main Stream Liberal" media [or for Rush it's the 'drive-by media'], the Hollywood Elite, the Big Unions, Femi-nazis. They tag Obama with terms like the Annointed One or The Messiah. Although it does puzzle me how those conservative folks like Limbaugh with huge ratings can claim that they themselves are not also 'Main Stream' media.

Lately, though, Limbaugh et al are getting nearly apoplectic over the Obama poll numbers.

They blame bad polling techniques. Limbaugh declared the Powell endorsement was "all about race", and nothing more. Limbaugh, Hannity, Levin have thrown every they can at Obama---calling him unpatriotic, a socialist, a radical, a radical socialist, liberal, leftwing, and 'that one'.

Limbaugh even so far as to call upon conservatives to visit the ailing stock market as Obama was visiting his ailing grandmother in Hawaii.

Limbaugh is losing it.

Sean Hannity and the Right Wing radio gang go nuts over the MoveOn.Org ad

So, Sean Hannity and the Right Wing radio gang go nuts over the MoveOn.Org ad on Friday.

All afternoon, Rush, Mark Levin, Sean et al are blasting MoveOn.Org with caller after caller questioning Move On.Org’s patriotism, sanity, support for the troops, etc.

And many Democratic law makers also thought the ad was a bit over the top ----Senator Carl Levin, and Sen. John Kerry, for example.


"I don't like any kind of characterizations in our politics that call into question any active-duty, distinguished general who I think under any circumstances serves with the best interests of our country," said Kerry.

Of course, personal attacks on the patriotism of a sitting general are never permissible in the middle of an unjustifiable and unpopular war.

I am sure the same thing happened to General Westmoreland when he lied about the Viet Nam War.

The more things change the more they remain the same. But the ad did strike a nerve and it gets people talking.

Anyway, MoveOn.Org released a new TV ad---one that moves from 'betray us' to 'betrayal of trust'.

Never mind these are the same people--Bush, Cheney et al-- who lied about weapons of mass destruction, the number of troops it would actually take to win the war, how long we would be there, and implying that Iraq had something to do with 9/11.

Of coure, none of that matters.

What seems to matter more to Sean & Co. is that MoveOn.Org attacked the General’s personal integrity and patriotism. Obviously, a much more important issue than the 3000 plus who gave their lives in the war.

Talkin' About My Red Generation...

There's an old joke that Woody Allen uses to sum up the main premise in his Academy Award winning classic from 1977, "Annie Hall":

Two elderly women are at a Catskill mountain resort, and one of 'em says, "Boy, the food at this place is really terrible." The other one says, "Yeah, I know; and such small portions.

That is the way I feel about the politics and policy emanating from the New Jersey Republican Party these days. Their ideas are really terrible, and they come in such small portions.

However, I do enjoy listening to Republican apologists such as Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh, Mike Savage, and Mark Levin on talk radio. Of late, they have become apoplectic with callers on the issue of the war. Or stem cell research. Or global climate change. As their president drops lower and lower in the polls, they have become like the band that played on ---- as the Titanic was sinking. There are icebergs all around, there are not enough lifeboats, and Sean, Rush, Savage and Levin still squawk on.

In New Jersey, if I want to know what the right is blogging on about, I do check on Red Jersey -recently changing their name from Red Generation. Don't know why they changed their name; maybe they can enlighten me.

This week, a blogger named ‘DBeck’ makes a startling suggestion for the NJGOP in his/her post entitled, “Bring on the L-word!”.

First, DBeck shares a brief history of just how the Democrats won back the state in 2001 ---“through constant moderation and selection of candidates who re-asserted these credentials" DeBeck says. Ok, that is a big “Duh!”, DBeck. So, the Democrats ran moderate candidates who espoused centrist values.... And somehow that is a problem or some sort of sneaky strategy because…?

Next, DBeck observes that the “successful labeling of GOP nominee Bret Schundler as an extremist”....“created the McGreevey landslide which brought Democrats back into power in a state where they have slight but not overwhelming legislative advantages.” Huh? The “Labeling” of Bret Schundler as an extremist? Double Huh? Schundler is a guy who was a pro-life candidate who was out of touch with main stream centrist New Jersey, period. The Democratic campaign of 2001 did not have to “label” him anything. They just told the truth. The majority of the state was not willing to elect a pro-life extremely conservative Republican as governor. You guys chose the wrong candidate in your primary that year. You had a choice of Congressman Bob Franks or Bret Schundler. You chose unwisely.

Finally, DBeck has the be-all plan to end all plans for the Republicans to take back New Jersey:

“Replace ‘corruption’ [as an issue] with, ‘Tax and Spend Liberal’ on those mailers this fall and I have a feeling we will be seeing a GOP-controlled State Senate.

And the comment following this sage advice declares agreement with DBeck by saying,
“I agree. I really hope someone over at the NJGOP read this post.”

Dig up from the campaign graveyard “Tax and Spend Liberal” ? Huh?

Is that the best you guys can come up with to help the Republican Party win back New Jersey? Quite frankly, I also hope someone over at the NJGOP reads this post. And follows your advice. It will be fun to watch this fall.

If you’re going back that far “slogan-wise”, why not try “Tippecanoe and Tyler Too”? Or maybe “Save the Union”. That worked pretty well for the guy who was the last good Republican president.

Or maybe “A Chicken in Every Pot and a Car in Every Garage”. That seems to have worked for Hoover. Well, at least in his first election, anyway.

The only time I will be concerned about Republicans taking back the state, is when they start thinking like the Democratic Party —opposing this insane war, supporting a pro-choice agenda, supporting embryonic stem cell research, or or maybe supporting legislation that deals with global climate change.

Until then, come up with as many old slogans as you can.