Monday, October 1, 2007

How many men does it take to make popcorn?

Congress and the president disagree on the war. And the president is about to veto a bill that will increase the funding for medical coverage for children. And now Congress and the president have parted company on another issue of national importance: protecting workers who make popcorn.

Congresswoman Sutton of Ohio: “The lack of an Occupational Safety and Health Administration standard on diacetyl has endangered the health of families. That is why we have to act today. Workers should never have to choose between their health and feeding their families."

The word from The White House via Rep. Lincoln Diaz-Balart, R-Fla.: "We believe that it's important to give OSHA time to complete a scientific study of diacetyl exposure and to issue a recommended exposure limit for the use of that chemical. Without a complete study, Congress may push manufacturers to use different chemicals that could be even more directly responsible for diseases."

The workers inhale the chemical “diacety” during the popcorn manufacturing process, and it causes ‘bronchiolitis obliterans’ ---also called popcorn lung. No, really.

And leading the charge to solve the problem is our very own South Jersey Congressman, Rep. Robert Andrews: "OSHA has not acted, so today we will.”

He supports legislation that will “institute air monitoring, medical surveillance and safety labeling; and require the wearing of protective clothing and equipment for workers exposed to it.”

Congress passed the legislation; the Senate has yet to consider it.

But along with stopping the war, spending more on children’s health, the president will probably veto this bill, too.

Maybe he hates pop corn and pretzels.

And the answer to the riddle is: Three. One to hold the pan and two others to act macho and shake the stove.

Sunday, September 30, 2007

Snakes vs New Jersey Developers


Tough choice on who’d win that confrontation.

Both have excellent speed, power and endurance.

One stays low to the ground, always crawling on its slimy underbelly. And the other is a slick and slippery reptile-like creature. I am not sure who’s more sneaky. One eats rats whole and has bugs for dessert; the other eats towns whole.

The Developers have a better legal team and more lobbyists. The snakes have a better environmental team, and have been around since the Garden of Eden.

All in all, it’s a toss-up.

But, if you took the point spread and the New Jersey Developers in Medford this week, you lost!

That’s right --- the corn snake and northern pine snake combined for all the points this week: The New Jersey Pinelands Commission put the kibosh on a 110-home project in Medford. A big goose egg for the Developers. Zero. Zippo. Nada.

Go Snakes! Score one for the slimy creatures (the snakes, not the lawyers).

In the corner for the Snakes is Carlton Montgomery, the director of the Pinelands Preservation Alliance. In the corner for developer ‘Bob Meyers Communities’ is, well, Bob Meyers.

Here’s the tale (or tail) of the tape:

The Snakes (courtesy of Newsday.com)
The corn snake _ a colorful, docile, rodent-eating species that's a popular choice for a pet reptile _ has been under state protection since 1979, and is presently listed as an endangered species. The dull-colored, secretive northern pine snake is listed as threatened.
Bob Meyer & The Developers (courtesy of www.bobmeyers.com)
For nearly half a century historic New Jersey towns like Evesham, Medford, Moorestown and Shamong have provided the perfect backdrop for the classic communities created by Bob Meyer. At Bob Meyer Communities, we know that building a new home is more than a practical decision. A new home is a purchase that will be part of your life for years to come. At Bob Meyer Communities, we build homes with a sense of history... yours and ours.
Unless, of course, there are corn snakes and/or northern pine snakes on the property.

The Snakes have won -- for now.

But a rematch has been set up already: The decision has been appealed to an administrative law judge.

Stay tuned.

Saturday, September 29, 2007

All in The New Jersey Family

“A North Jersey mayor and his wife have been indicted on federal charges of conspiracy to commit extortion and conspiracy to commit mail fraud. They are accused of extorting gifts and cash that paid for gambling, plastic surgery and a dog.” (9/29/07 New York Times)

It’s nice to see a married couple still sharing interests together. Especially if they're from small town America: Guttenberg, NJ (in the middle of Hudson County) is just 11 blocks long and 4 blocks wide.

Of course, in New Jersey in Hudson County those 'shared interests' include the family dog, gambling trips to Atlantic City and…extortion. Gotta love New Jersey.
"Mayor David Delle Donna, 49, of Guttenberg, a tiny town wedged into populous Hudson County, surrendered to federal agents yesterday in Newark. He and his wife, Anna Delle Donna, 58, appeared in court and were released on $100,000 bail. They are accused of accepting the gifts and money from a bar owner in exchange for political favors." New York Times, 9/29/07
(My apologies to Charles Stouse and Lee Adams, songwriters of the "All in the Family" TV theme song.)

All in The New Jersey Family

Gutten
berg’s Mayor and his wife
Took bribes so they could have a better life
.
Helped a Guttenberg bar through its strife.

Those were the days.


“Cash is what it takes you see;

To get a dog, and for plastic surgery
.
Mister, We could use a trip ---
The shores of Atlantic City, again.”


“We’re not guilty of the crime!”
“We never took dough - not one thin dime!”

Gee --they’ll end up doing time.

Those were the days
.

New Jersey officials can't seem to give money away

“New Jersey officials can't seem to give money away when it comes to the nation's highest property taxes. About 200,000 people have failed to apply for their property tax rebates, costing themselves $200 million total, Democratic leaders said yesterday. About 1.1 million rebate checks were mailed to homeowners last week, but Senate President Richard J. Codey and Assembly Speaker Joseph Roberts Jr. urged those who haven't applied to do so before the Oct. 31 application deadline.” (Hester, AP)

So, the state with the highest property taxes in the nation left rebate checks totaling about $200 million on the table. Go figure.

And there are 200,000 of them. Clueless.

Probably these are the same types of guys who drive a Pacer or a Yugo, drive with their left signal on in the left lane, have an eight-track deck in their car, is not registered to vote, live at home with their parents, did not think that Don Imus said anything wrong, does not have an EZ-pass, and roots for the Mets (North Jersey) or Phillies (South Jersey).

Here is the way to make sure the State actually distributes the money: Send out a press release telling people they CANNOT have their money back. "Nope, you can't have it back. We're going to keep it and use it to....buy glow in the dark shoes for all the deer in the state so that....can be seen at night".

People will go nuts making sure they get their money back.


Friday, September 28, 2007

After seven years, The President STILL Am Learning

Socrates said, "The unexamined life is not worth living."

And President Bush has been examining his life since 2000, since he said:

"Is our children learning?"
-- George W. Bush, January 11, 2000

Well, after seven years of contemplating that thought, the other day he found the answer:

"Childrens do learn."
-- George W. Bush, September 26, 2007


Thursday, September 27, 2007

"Not I" said, the Democratic candidates for President.

Every child knows the story of the Little Red Hen:

One day as the Little Red Hen was scratching in a field, she found a grain of wheat.

"This wheat should be planted," she said. "Who will plant this grain of wheat?"

"Not I," said the Duck.


"Not I," said the Cat.


"Not I," said the Dog.


"Then I will," said the Little Red Hen. And she did…


And the story goes on and on like this, where the duck, the cat, and the dog give no help to the Little Red Hen with the planting, the baking, the threshing…you know the deal.

Now, here’s the latest from the Presidential debate Wednesday night:

When asked if, as president, they would guarantee that American troops would be out of Iraq by the end of their first term (in 2013), here is what the brave Democrats had to say:

"I think it's hard to project four years from now," said Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois.

"It is very difficult to know what we're going to be inheriting," said Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton.

"I cannot make that commitment," said former Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina.

Maybe the Little Red Hen was a red because she was a Republican.

Wednesday, September 26, 2007

Republicans in New Jersey who face tough races: They’re in SCHIP shape.

Since they know their president will veto the SCHIP bill anyway, Republican members of Congress facing tough races next year voted in the affirmative on the bill.

SCHIP is State Children’s Health Insurance Program ----“a national program designed for families who earn too much money to qualify for Medicaid, but cannot afford to buy private insurance. The program was created to address the growing number of children in the United States without health insurance.”

Democrats want to increase the funding of the program, while Republicans want to keep the funding flat.

Ferguson is a Schmerguson: Congressman Mike Ferguson voted against SCHIP before he voted for it. AND he faces another tough race in ’08 against Assemblywoman Linda Stender ----who lost by just a single point in ’06.

Sex vs Sax: In 2006, Congressman Jim Saxton faced Democratic candidate Rick Sexton. Despite the similar sounding names, the numbers were not even close: Saxton got 58% of the vote, while Sexton received just 41%.

Saxton probably didn’t even sweat that much. But, wait, in 2008----Saxton will face a much tougher opponent in State Senator John Adler. Saxton is 64 years old, and has been in Congress since 1984.

<--------Adler has served in the New Jersey State Senate since 1992, where he represents the 6th Legislative District. Adler was Democratic Conference Chair from 2002-03 and Assistant Minority Leader from 1994-2001.

He was ahead of the curve with an endorsement of John Kerry in 2004, while the rest of the state went for Howard Dean. For 2008, he is supporting Obama. Not for nothing, Adler does not follow the crowd.

Both Republicans probably did not wish to be tagged as ‘anti-children’ in a year before they were up for re-election again--- so the safe vote is voting for SCHIP. As long as they have the political ‘cover’ of a presidential veto, they think they’re OK and joined the other 45 Republicans in voting for SCHIP.

But let’s see what happens when they’re pressured to vote to overturn their president’s veto.

That’s when the fun begins.

Tuesday, September 25, 2007

Jury Duty and Stamps

I went to the post office today and mailed some letters. I was given the new Jury Duty Stamp.

Now, the much easier way to send messages these days is either by email or by postage meter --- but maybe I am old fashioned.

I still like stamps.

The folks at the US Post Office are very creative about 'who', 'what' and 'where' they honor on their stamps. Unlike the folks at the US Mint who are generally limited to dead presidents for our money, the folks at the US Post Office can be much more creative.

And sometimes they get really darn ingenious with their choices.

Recently there have been stamps issued to honor the Hershey’s Kiss, singer Ella Fitzgerald, Darth Vader, and even Marvel Comics superhero/villian Silver Surfer.

And sometimes they are as conservative as the US Mint: A recent stamp honored former president Gerald Ford.

But they really must be running out of ideas this time.

They issued a stamp earlier this month to honor Jury Duty. No, not the 1995 movie with Pauly Shore. The societal obligation.

Yup, that public responsibility that nearly everyone and their mother tries to avoid now has its very own stamp. For just 41 cents, you can send that birthday card to your Aunt Fanny in Florida or the money you owe your Cousin Marvin in Minneapolis ---with a tribute to Jury Duty in the upper right hand corner of the envelope.

"I am thrilled by the Postal Service's issuance of the Jury Duty stamp, which celebrates the important role of our citizenry in the delivery of justice," said Chief Judge Judith Kaye of New York. "We rightly take pride in this uniquely American institution, which has been a great strength of our nation from its very beginnings."

Thrilled? Judge Judith needs to get out more.

Today the postage clerk at the Flemington post office told me that she thought “more people will respect jury duty, now that it has its own stamp, and not try to duck their obligation”. Good thought; most people I know certainly do get their moral and ethical motivation from postage stamps.

The stamp itself pictures twelve of your “peers” ---of all colors of the rainbow. Maybe, just maybe, one of the jurors is named Roy G. Biv.

There are orange and purple jurors. There are three jurors who are three different shades of green and two different shades of blue. All in all, the jurors look like they have food poisoning, and turned different colors as they got sicker and sicker.

Now, I think that the jury system is a very important constitutional right.

And a vital part of American history. Ever since the Magna Carta promised “no freeman shall be taken or imprisoned ... except by the lawful judgment of his peers or by the law of the land,” the jury system has proven to be a very cool institution.

But a stamp? Maybe I am too cynical.

It’s such a slippery slope, though ---stamps commemorating societal obligations.

What’s next a stamp honoring Cross at the green, not in between”---maybe with the green guy from the jury duty stamp crossing a street safely.

Or an airmail package with a “No Spitting” themed stamp.

For New Jersey, perhaps a stamp with the purple guy paying a toll or the orange lady laying out on the Jersey Shore listening to Springsteen.

It could happen.

Judge Says Item on Stem Cells Stays on Ballot

A state judge ruled on Monday that a $450 million bond proposal to finance stem cell research must stay on the November ballot, dealing a blow to abortion opponent. (New York Times, 9/22)


Guess those abortion opponents who trusted the judgment of an ‘actvist’ judge instead of the wisdom of the residents of New Jersey got what they deserved.

The judge concluded that the case, filed on behalf of 16 plaintiffs, was filed too late to qualify for the “imminent harm” claim to have any validity. He declared the claim of ‘imminent harm’ was “self-created.”

Now, residents can help New Jersey continue to be a leader in the field of stem cell research. Support the New Jersey Stem Cell Research Bond Act.

And support Democrats this election season. If Republicans take over the Legislature, this could be dead in the water.

Some stem cell basics:

Stem cells have the remarkable potential to develop into many different cell types in the body. Serving as a sort of repair system for the body, they can theoretically divide without limit to replenish other cells as long as the person or animal is still alive. When a stem cell divides, each new cell has the potential to either remain a stem cell or become another type of cell with a more specialized function, such as a muscle cell, a red blood cell, or a brain cell.

Sunday, September 23, 2007

What’s in a name? An arena by any other name…

According to an article in Newsday: What once was the Brendan Byrne Arena, and then became the Continental Airlines Arena, is now looking for a name.

The airline pays $1.3 million annually for those naming rights. I think the former governor got away for free.

Amazingly, the Roman Coliseum has stood for more than a thousand years ---since 80 AD ---and still has the same name. That guy "Roman" must have got a hell of naming rights deal.

Anyway, the naming rights of “The Arena Formerly Known as Brendan” are up for grabs.

I guess the whole corpo naming rights idea is not a bad one. Some think it's stupid. But, money is to be made on the ‘naming rights’ for the New Jersey Sports and Exposition Authority ---but it’s gonna be a tough sell. The Houston based airline, Continental backed out of a deal due to major changes in the tenants of the arena.

The New Jersey Nets are goin’ back to Brooklyn (they started out on Long Island years and years ago with Dr. J as the NY Nets), where they will live out their days in the Barclays Center, (Barclays Bank is paying $400 million for twenty years for the naming rights.)

Also, theNew Jersey Devils are moving to the brand spankin’ new Prudential Center in Newark very soon.

Some companies have been through the arena, to check it out for naming rights. George Zoffinger, CEO of the authority, said a tour of the arena by potential bidders earlier this month didn't go as well as expected.

"With the uncertainty of the building, it's a very difficult sell," he said.

So, it will be empty. Vacant. Uncertainty certainly abounds.

Subsequently, I thought I might help out by going on www.superpages.com, to find some possible monthly renters. George, here are companies whose actual names reflect the current status of the arena. Maybe you can give these a shot:

“Empty” Cloud Ta'l Chi
210 West 94th Street
New York, NY 10025

“Empty” Pockets
4095 US Highway 1,
Monmouth Junction, NJ 08852

“Empty” Building Security
378 Schuyler Avenue
Kearny, NJ 07032

“Vacant” No-Callback
429 Greenwich
New York, NY 10013

“Vacant” Property Security Inc
50 Center Street
Oradell, NJ 07649

Hope one of these works out.

If not, I will bid $1000 a year for the “Joey Novick Arena”, ---- as long as it comes with my picture on the front of the building. Let me know if that works for you guys, and I will draw up the agreement------------>

Or maybe, just maybe, you could name the arena after someone who has done really good things for the state of New Jersey.



----like Brendan Byrne.

Now, there's a novel idea.

Saturday, September 22, 2007

Welcome to Riverside. Now get out.

Last year Riverside passed a controversial law that was geared to keep out illegal immigrants.

It was passed in a hurry, and focused on fining landlords who rented apartments to illegal aliens and on employers who hired them.

However, the law was never really enforced, and it was recently rescinded. The Riverside Council decided they did not have the funds to deal with the civil rights law suits that the town might be hit with.

The immigrants--- Brazilians----have mostly left. And are not likely to come back. Would you?

From www.phillyburbs.com: "The cost to continue fighting this would have been astronomical and we need a new town hall and new streets," said Deputy Mayor Lorraine Hatcher. "The writing was on the wall: It's a federal issue."

Well, duh. That was what opponents to the law said more than a year ago.

Now the town has lost part of its population that rented apartments and shopped in stores. The result? Empty storefronts. Empty apartments.

Many Brazilians are not coming back.

"I wouldn't come back either," said Luis Ordonez, a U.S. citizen from Ecuador who owns the River Dance Music Store on Scott Street. "Do you want to live in a place where you are not welcome?"

A Hell of Lady Just Got into Heaven.

Today I went to the memorial service of a hell of a Democratic dame.

A lifelong FDR Democrat, Anna Zyck. She was so full of life and had the kind of spunk that made you know that she did not suffer fools at all. I am privileged to be included in the people she considered a friend.

She was a Democrat’s Democrat. Voted in every primary. Voted in every election. Always had every Democrat’s sign on her lawn come election time. She was always decked out in her red, white, and blue outfit each and every Memorial Day parade.

She was a registered nurse and a graduate of the St. Francis Hospital School of Nursing, Trenton. Anna was also a graduate of the Nurse Cadet Program at Lakehurst during World War II. During her lengthy nursing career, she was a nurse at the Hunterdon Medical Center, a private duty nurse, a nurse at the Hunterdon Developmental Center and was a longtime volunteer nurse with the Senior Health Services of Hunterdon County.

She received a Governor's Award for volunteer nursing.

Her sense of humor knew no bounds. Anna, we are all better off from having known you. And we will feel your loss each and every election day.

If there’s a political heaven, they have a new activist to contend with.

Business Lobbyists love Republicans

According to their website, the Commerce and Industry Association of New Jersey (CIANJ) was “established in 1927…has approximately 900 members, from Fortune 500 companies like Hertz Corporation, Ingersoll-Rand, Continental Airlines, Stryker, PSE&G, Sharp, and Sony to emerging companies and sole proprietorships representing all areas of business and industry. The organization is the leader in free enterprise advocacy for the purpose of providing - through education, legislative vigilance and membership interaction - an economic climate that enhances business potential and makes New Jersey a better state in which to live, work and conduct business.”

But that's not the whole story. They also seem to have a love affair with Republicans.

Their PAC, called the Private Enterprise Political Action Committee (PENPAC) has endorsed 40 plus Republicans for the state legislature, and only five Democrats.

Part of the criteria for the PENPAC choice: "A commitment to reducing government regulation."

And we all know what that means for consumers and labor.

Amongst the Republicans endorsed were Senator Sonny McCullough, Assemblyman Mike Doherty, and Assembly Minority Leader Alex DeCroce ---all safe bets for Big Business.

The Democrats endorsed were Assemblyman and Senate Candidate Francis L. Bodine, Assemblyman Upendra Chivukula, Senator Paul Sarlo, Assemblyman Gary S. Schaer, and Senator Ray Lesniak.

PENPAC Chairman Richard Goldberg said, "..it is critical that these candidates, who believe in smaller government, are elected to the New Jersey legislature. ”

CIANJ also vehemently opposes the Employee Free Choice Act (H.R. 800, S. 1041), which is supported by a bipartisan coalition in Congress. When enacted, the Employee Free Choice Act would level the playing field for workers and employers and help rebuild America’s middle class. It would restore workers’ freedom to choose a union by:

• Establishing stronger penalties for violation of employee rights when workers seek to form a union and during first-contract negotiations.
• Providing mediation and arbitration for first-contract disputes.
• Allowing employees to form unions by signing cards authorizing union representation.

Joining CIANJ in opposing the Employee Free Choice Act are anti-union front groups like the discredited Center for Union Facts, led by lobbyist Richard Berman. Berman is infamous for fighting against drunk driving laws and consumer and health protections. Also, the National Right to Work Committee and Foundation, the country’s oldest organization dedicated exclusively to destroying unions, also joins CIANJ in opposing the Employee Free Choice Act.

President Bush has threatened to veto the the Employee Free Choice Act.

That alone should tell you everything you need to know about the CIANJ.

Friday, September 21, 2007

We're fighting in Iraq so that their people can enjoy free speech, too.

We enjoy freedom of speech here in America.

Even New Jersey students have the same right of protest we are trying to make sure the Iraqi people have.


This from AP newswire:

STUDENT PROTESTERS FREE TO WEAR HITLER YOUTH BUTTON

A federal judge in Newark has ruled two students who wished to protest a school-uniform requirement may indeed wear buttons featuring identically clad members of the Hitler Youth. The students had been threatened with suspension, but U.S. District Judge Joseph A. Greenaway, citing the Vietnam War-era case Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, wrote that only if students' speech will "materially and substantially disrupt the work and discipline of the school" may they be punished for it. He rejected the school district's argument that an image of Hitler Youth was inherently abhorrent and disruptive, but ruled the boys cannot distribute the buttons to other students on school property.

Thursday, September 20, 2007

Petraeus and The Political Punchline

Here are some of the best points of view on the General Petraeus report from the world of comedy, as Bush hides behind him...

"Earlier today was the big Iraq report. General Petraeus said the troops can start coming home next summer. ... I believe his exact words were, 'And then it's Hillary's mess.'" --David Letterman

"Another big day on Capitol Hill. General Petraeus testified again today before Congress about the Iraq war. Some Democrats are claiming that Petraeus' answers are scripted by President Bush. Which explains Petraeus' use of the word 'surgerrific.'" --Conan O'Brien

"Petraeus gave his progress report on Iraq to Congress. Many of the senators commented to the general. Senator Barbara Boxer said Petraeus was overly optimistic; Mel Martinez of Florida thanked the general; Senator Larry Craig of Idaho said, 'There's something about a man in uniform.'" --Jay Leno

"General Petraeus was in Washington testifying before the Senate. After the testimony, Senator Craig said, 'You may not know this, general, but right now I'm saluting you.'" --David Letterman

Tuesday, September 18, 2007

Free-wheelin' Freeholders

I am personally and politically offended when Republicans lecture anybody, including the Democratic Party, on the issue of fiscal responsibility.

On the national, state, and local levels they continue to make fiscally unsound choices, going against [again and again] their so-called ‘core’ philosophy of ‘conservatism’.

That, as Spanky from the Little Rascals would say, is a lot of hooey.

On the national level, Bush and the Republicans in Congress squandered a surplus created in the Clinton years, and have spent billions on an endless war in Iraq.

On the state level, when Whitman and the Republicans were in charge, they grew state debt astronomically, while borrowing $2.6 billion without public approval to pay for the state pension fund.

And on the local level in my home county, the Hunterdon County Freeholders just spent more than two million dollars building a clubhouse for the County golf course. Outrageous.

Now I like golf as much as the next guy---especially if the next guy does not play golf. However, I think Hunterdon residents should be outraged that the County is getting in to the Country Club business.

What's next? Restaurants. Night Clubs, Bowling Alleys. The list of possible businesses is endless.

These are the same so-called free market Republicans who disdain when the government gets in to any kind of ‘business’ ----that is much better administered by private businesses.

“It’s a good deal for the County" they say. ‘It will increase business at the golf course,' they offer.

Perhaps it will.

However, if a clubhouse is such great deal, why can’t they find ‘private investors’ to provide the construction capital? Isn’t that the way the ‘free market’ in capitalism is supposed to work? If a business man or a business woman sees value in the construction and maintenance of a golf club house, are we not better off allowing that private investment to flourish, rather than taking property tax dollars that are better spent on actual public services? Those dollars could be used for employee salaries, road construction, bridge repair or dare I say it ---- to help offset rising taxes.

I thank Freeholders George Melick and Eric Peterson for opposing the clubhouse construction. But the other Republicans ----Ron Sworen, Matt Holt and George Muller: shame on you.

Soon your party will think you’re voting like ----dare I say it ----damn liberals!

Unless the golf course is going to draw the likes of Tiger Woods, but only if we have a great Clubhouse ----I think the Freeholders should can it.

Oh, and maybe someone can read it to him.

Ok, so up till now it seems like the Democrats in Congress have no will to actually leave Iraq. And, sad to say, some of the same people who voted to support the war, also supported the surge. Perhaps there is no good plan to leave Iraq, only a field of very bad choices. Well, you can’t say we didn’t tell you so. That’s why you don’t get in to wars like this.

But, alas, we did go in.

An old liberal Democratic warhorse has come up with an idea on how to actually leave Iraq. Remember Senator George McGovern? For those of you my age, that’s a stupid question.

For the rest of you, he was the guy who won Massachusetts and DC in the 1972 Presidential election, but came in second to Nixon. Yes, the election right before Watergate and Nixon’s resignation. Perhaps if he were the president back then…but I digress.

Senator McGovern has written a book with William R. Polk, Out of Iraq: A Practical Plan for Withdrawal Now. And it’s in paperback, too.

But don’t take my word for it. Here is what the folks at the Middle East Policy Council have to say about the book:

“The real importance of McGovern and Polk’s short book has been to offer an alternative framing of the choices facing America in Iraq from those found in either the careful calls for regional diplomacy and redeployment of the Baker-Hamilton Commission’s report or the president’s wildly unpopular and almost certainly doomed choice to instead “surge” tens of thousands of additional American troops into Iraq. The once heretical idea of a rapid American withdrawal has now moved to the center of American politics. Withdrawal gets ever-more support in public-opinion polls and has been endorsed by Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards, while both houses of Congress passed a bill containing the (unenforceable) demand for a 2008 departure date. Detailed proposals for a withdrawal are popping up everywhere from The Nation (Juan Cole) to the Council on Foreign Relations (Steven Simon) to MIT’s Security Studies program (Barry Posen). Clearly, a sea change has taken place in American politics on the question of Iraq. Out of Iraq may one day be read as a key crystallization of this moment.”

Buy one and send it to President Bush for the coming holiday season.

Monday, September 17, 2007

Sean Hannity and the Right Wing radio gang go nuts over the MoveOn.Org ad

So, Sean Hannity and the Right Wing radio gang go nuts over the MoveOn.Org ad on Friday.

All afternoon, Rush, Mark Levin, Sean et al are blasting MoveOn.Org with caller after caller questioning Move On.Org’s patriotism, sanity, support for the troops, etc.

And many Democratic law makers also thought the ad was a bit over the top ----Senator Carl Levin, and Sen. John Kerry, for example.


"I don't like any kind of characterizations in our politics that call into question any active-duty, distinguished general who I think under any circumstances serves with the best interests of our country," said Kerry.

Of course, personal attacks on the patriotism of a sitting general are never permissible in the middle of an unjustifiable and unpopular war.

I am sure the same thing happened to General Westmoreland when he lied about the Viet Nam War.

The more things change the more they remain the same. But the ad did strike a nerve and it gets people talking.

Anyway, MoveOn.Org released a new TV ad---one that moves from 'betray us' to 'betrayal of trust'.

Never mind these are the same people--Bush, Cheney et al-- who lied about weapons of mass destruction, the number of troops it would actually take to win the war, how long we would be there, and implying that Iraq had something to do with 9/11.

Of coure, none of that matters.

What seems to matter more to Sean & Co. is that MoveOn.Org attacked the General’s personal integrity and patriotism. Obviously, a much more important issue than the 3000 plus who gave their lives in the war.

Sunday, September 16, 2007

Can't we all get along?


The New Jersey Congressional delegation obviously disagree on the recent report on Iraq 'progress'.

In a nutshell:

Senator Menendez:

On the the General Petraeus report: "He said that even if (President Bush) were to ask him such a question, he would decline. It is evident to me that . . . our top general cannot see an end to the war.

Congressman Jim Saxton:

"We can choose to stay committed to success, withdraw at the appropriate time and leave the Iraqis celebrating freedom, or we can leave prematurely and allow the forces of evil and terror to carry out their mission."

Without the votes in Congress to leave soon, or the will for a majority of Democrats to take a stand, we will be in Iraq for generations to come.

"Fasten your seatbelts. It's going to be a bumpy night."---and for years to come!

Thursday, September 13, 2007

Conversations in Congress: Thumbs up on Iraq!


"Does the [Iraq war] make America safer?"
--Senator John Warner

"I don't know, actually."

-- General David Petraeus, in his testimony before the Senate Tuesday.

Maybe we can believe them, this time.