Tuesday, August 24, 2010

Congressman Lance: “yada yada yada… tax cuts… yada yada yada… Republican ‘no’ votes"

Last night I went to the town hall meeting of my congressman, Leonard Lance. Unlike, the summer town hall meetings of 2009, this was rather tame by comparison.

First of all, I want to say that I like Leonard Lance very much. When I was on Borough Council in Flemington, he was always extraordinarily helpful getting us much-needed financial support from the state for roads and other municipal projects. Back then, State Sen. Lance would have no problem getting “earmarks” for those in his district. But now, Congressman Lance toes the Republican line against such earmarks. Oh, what a difference a few years and a larger district makes.

I expected that there would be many Tea Party people taking the Congressman to task on his Cap and Trade vote––but I guess that issue is mostly over since the June primary. Back then, three separate Tea Party candidates failed to garner even a majority of the vote to oust Lance. So there were conservative Tea Party people there at the Town Hall meeting, who had only supportive questions for the congressman. The only time I heard them peep or squawk was when a Democrat got up to ask a question and expressed support for Obama,––then there were boos and hisses. They were rude bunch to say the least.

There's no question about it---after seeing him last night---Congressman Lance is very different from State Sen. Lance. State Sen. Lance is the person who bucked his own party by voting against a pension bond scheme by then Gov. and family friend Christie Todd Whitman. He also was the person as Sen. Lance to sue then Governor Jim McGreevy over borrowing money for the state without voter approval.

I got a chance to ask him if he had to do it over again, would he support Cap and Trade this time around. His answer: "No, I would not.” His answer, however, did not surprise me––because he flip-flopped on this issue mostly under pressure from the right wing of his party. What did surprise me is his reason for flip-flopping on the issue: He said that the reason why he would not vote for Cap and Trade again is because “the Obama administration did a poor job of negotiating in Copenhagen”, and he wasn't willing to take on the responsibility for the United States to deal with this issue alone. Of course, the follow-up question I should've asked had I thought of it would have been, “so Congressman, had the Obama administration negotiated successfully in Copenhagen then you would still be supporting Cap and Trade?”

And so, Congressman Lance “yada yada yada’d” his way through questions about his “no” votes on job creation, consumer protection against Wall Street's schemes, and his switch on Cap and Trade. I believe that he is still one of the few Republicans who was moderate in his heart, but has become conservative in his “political brain”.

As long as the seventh District has to have a Republican in Congress, I wish we had the old Leonard Lance back. He was a maverick, he was independent, and voted his own mind. Unfortunately, we may not see that Leonard Lance again for a while––if at all.

5 comments:

Jeff said...

Couldn't agree more. I've been saying for months that the 'old Leonard' has been changed by his time in DC. Specifically, his vote for 'cap and trade' seems to have been the tipping point.

That was a vote for the interests of his constituents in NJ-7. I think he must have gotten an earful from Eric Cantor -- as well as the hard primary challenge -- and now he's a reliable vote for the GOP.

I agree that it's a shame, because the 'old Leonard' would be a welcome voice of moderation in the House.

Anonymous said...

Yes, it is shocking the dear old Len now actually represents the voters who put him in office.

What a shock! How dare he actually represents his constituents and not represent the small minority of left wingers such as Joey and Jeff.

I dare say you two didn't vote for Len nor would you vote for him in the future.

Joey and Jeff.... yada yada yada....

Tunghoy said...

In response to @Anonymous:

Yes indeed, Leonard Lance supports the people in the district....if by "people", you mean insurance, pharmaceutical and investment corporations. As the Supreme Court told us in the Citizens United case, corporations are now classified as people. But as teabaggers told us, Hispanic, Muslim and gay Americans are not.

So I have to hand it to Rep. Lance. He's the best Congressman money can buy.

Anonymous said...

@Tunghoy

I was unaware that Lance was a Supreme Court Justice.

Wait... you mean he is not? I really enjoyed your non sequitur humor.

"This new knowledge fascinates me, tell us again how sheep's bladder can predict earthquakes..."

Pakistani Talk Shows said...

Love the website-- extremely individual friendly and great deals to see. Hum TV Dramas, ARY Dramas, Pakistani Talk Shows, Dramas Online, Drama Online, Urdu Columns, ARY Dramas And Urdu News